Ads
Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads




  • subnature

    subnature
    brooklyn NEW YORK

    [JURY SELECTION]

    Pratt Institute
    critics: michael CHEN & jason LEE

    suckerPUNCH: describe your project.

    carla LORES + michael YARINSKY: New York City’s Watershed is a site in crisis. Not only is there a larger demand for water due to the growth of the population, but due to further suburban development in upland areas, water catchment sites are not as hygienic as once thought. Within the Croton Watershed lies Carmel. This suburban town in Putnam County has large basins for water catchment integrated into a developed suburban community. The distributed system currently in place for the dispersal of sewage, though, has a very high risk of contaminating the watershed.

    Based on a topological study using sand and cavities to represent the density and area of groundwater contamination risk, a landscape was generated. The areas that are highest upland have the highest ground water capacity and lowest contamination risk, and the areas downland have the lowest capacity and highest risk. This relationship is key to the remediation strategy, by creating a topography that channels effluent water to these specific sites. The exo-landscape is then populated with components that not only allow the material flow relationship but can also be modulated to allow for varying lighting conditions and the ability to contain soil and plants. This passive system is then activated by integrated pumps that draw sewage to biogas processing sites.

    Using pastoral ideas native to the development of suburban landscaping, such as the sweeping vista, winding pathway, scenic overlook and grotto, we develop the landscape to be a desirable recreation site. Overlaid, layers of sewage, air, and water flow create a new material ecology within Carmel. Since the sites of highest contamination risk are protected, New York City’s Watershed is more protected than previously. Because the system is automated to deposit and process waste into the sites of highest capacity, the system as a whole has a larger capacity for sewage.

    This project hopes to blur the boundary between what is considered clean and contaminated, synthetic and natural, and in doing so foster a modified suburban desire. This, through the intensification of existing conditions of a synthetic pastoral and the gizmo begins to challenge the boundaries that enabled the development of suburbia in the first place.

    sP: what or who influenced this project?
    cL+mY: Reyner Banham, Haresh Lalvani, Manuel DeLanda, David Cronenberg’s films and Gregory Crewdson’s photographs…

    sP: what were you reading/listening to/watching while developing this project?
    cL+mY: Reading Louis-Ferdinand Céline’s “Death on the Installment Plan,” listening to Pokey LaFarge and the South City Three, and watching The Mighty Boosh.

    sP: whose work is currently on your radar?
    cL+mY: Bjarke Ingels Group, ARO and AVL

    Additional credits and links:
    Instructors: Michael CHEN + Jason LEE

    JURY COMMENTS ///

    aaron BETSKY — Treating nature not as something holy, but as a troubled system into which human artifice is already entwined, this project proposes making sewage treatment a walk in the park. I like the frank manipulation of infrastructure and ground into a continuous form, though I wish the result was simply either prettier in the tradition of landscape architecture, or grittier.

    , , , , , , ,

  • Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.