Ads
Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads




  • symposium: Type vs. Typology

    Type vs. Typology.
    london UNITED KINGDOM

    During the nineteenth century, a deliberate turn away from ideas of imitation and truth-to-nature towards concepts of abstraction or objectivity emerged and fundamentally altered the knowledge and practices of many disciplines. . . .

    symposium: “Type vs. Typology.”
    Friday, 02/07
    10.00 a.m. (start) / Lecture Hall
    Architectural Association
    36 Bedford Square
    London WC1B 3ES

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    In architecture, this important shift resulted in theories of type and design methods based on typology, complementary concepts through which architecture as both a modern form of knowledge and knowledge of form was to be consolidated. In terms of architecture and its instrumentality, type and typology are unique as disciplinary frames through which broader socio-political, cultural and formal problems can be posed.

    To explore the sustained, or perhaps renewed critical, interest in the potential of type and typology, a number of academics and practitioners will discuss their relevance to contemporary architectural practice and research, and in relationship to the problem of the historicity of disciplinary knowledge.

    SESSION 1

    10.00–10.10 Welcome

    10.10–10.50 Sam Jacoby (AAPC): “Typal and Typological Reasoning.”
    10.50–11.30 Larry Barth (AA)
    11.30–12.10 Hyungmin Pai (University of Seoul): “The Diagrammatic Construction of Type.”
    12.10–12.40 Panel Discussion: Chaired by Alvaro Arancibia (AA PhD) and Cyan Cheng (AAPC)

    1.00–2.00 Lunch Break

    SESSION 2

    2.00–2.40 Philip Steadman (UCL): “Building Types and How they Change over Time.”
    2.40–3.20 Tarsha Finney (UTS): “The Typological Burden.”
    3:20–4:00 Christopher Lee (Harvard GSD, Serie Architects): “The Fourth Typology.”
    4:00–4:30 Panel Discussion: Chaired by Naina Gupta (AAPC), Simon Goddard (AAPC), and Thiago Soveral (AA PhD)

    5:00–6:30 Coffee Break (Mark Cousins: Friday Lecture Series)

    SESSION 3

    6.30–7.10 Rafael Moneo (Harvard GSD): “Type, Iconography, Archaeology, and Practice.”
    7.10–8.00 Concluding Round Table: All speakers; chaired by Adrian Lahoud (UCL)

    PARTICIPANTS

    Lawrence Barth lectures on urbanism in the AAs Graduate School and has written on the themes of politics and critical theory in relation to the urban. He practises as a consultant urbanist, most recently collaborating with Zaha Hadid Architects and s333 Architecture and Urbanism on large‐scale projects, and is engaged in research on urban intensification and innovation environments.

    Tarsha Finney is an architect, urbanist and a senior lecturer in the School of Architecture at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS). She completed an MA at the AA (Distinction 2002‐2003) and was recipient of the Michael Ventris Memorial Award (2003). From 2004‐2008 as part of the doctoral program at the AA, she was a participant in research seminars led by Lawrence Barth: Rethinking Architectural Urbanism 2006‐2007; Transformation and Urban Change 2007‐2008. She is completing her Doctorate at UTS, Domains of Reasoning/Fields of Effect: The Housing Project and the City. New York, 1960‐1980.

    Sam Jacoby is an architect who trained as a cabinetmaker, graduated from the AA, and received a doctorate from the TU Berlin. He teaches at the AA since 2002 and has taught at the University of Nottingham and Bartlett School of Architecture. He has directed Projective Cities since 2009.

    Christopher Lee is the co‐founder and principal of Serie Architects London, Mumbai and Beijing. He is Associate Professor in Practice at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design. Prior to that he was the Director of Projective Cities (2010‐12) and AA Unit Master (2002‐09). Lee graduated with the AA Diploma (Honours) and his Doctor of Philosophy from the Berlage Institute and TU Delft. Lee is the author of Common Frameworks: Rethinking the Developmental City in China, Part 1, Xiamen: The Megaplot, and Working in Series. He co‐authored Typological Formations: Renewable Building Types and the City, and Typological Urbanism: Projective Cities.

    Rafael Moneo received undergraduate (1961) and doctoral (1965) degrees from the Madrid School of Architecture, worked (1960‐61) with Danish architect Jørn Utzon, and studied (1963‐65) at the Spanish Academy in Rome before opening (1965) his own practice in Madrid. Moneo, who founded (1968) Arquitectura Bis magazine, is also a noted theorist, critic, and teacher. He has taught in Spain and at such American institutions as Princeton and Harvard, where he was (1985‐90) head of the graduate architecture department and remains a professor. Among his many awards is the 1996 Pritzker Prize.

    Hyungmin Pai graduated from Seoul National University and received his Ph.D from MIT. Twice a Fulbright Scholar, he is professor at the University of Seoul. He was visiting scholar at MIT and London Metropolitan University and has lectured at Harvard, Cornell and Tongji University. His books include The Portfolio and the Diagram, Sensuous Plan: The Architecture f Seung H‐Sang, and The Key Concepts of Korean Architecture. For the Venice Biennale, he was curator for the Korean Pavilion (2008) and a participant in the Common Pavilion project (2012). He was curator for the Kim Swoo Geun exhibition at Aedes Gallery, Berlin (2011) and was Head Curator for the 4th Gwangju Design Biennale (2011).

    Philip Steadman is Emeritus Professor of Urban and Built Form Studies in the Bartlett Faculty of Built Environment, University College London. He trained as an architect at Cambridge University, and has taught at Cambridge, the Open University and UCL. Much of his research has been on the forms of buildings, and he has published two previous books on the subject: The Geometry of Environment (1971) and Architectural Morphology (1983). His book on biological analogies in architecture, The Evolution of Designs, was published in 1979. His forthcoming book Building Types and Built Forms (2014) brings together several of these themes: architectural history, building geometry, and parallels with the analysis of form in biology.

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.