Ads
Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads




  • 45 Thompson Street

    David Brian HARROP, "45 Thompson Street." Exterior elevation.
    philadelphia PENNSYLVANIA

    University of Pennsylvania, PennDesign
    critic: Kutan AYATA.

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.

    David Brian HARROP: My proposal for the micro-unit housing tower uses a system of cracks into the mass of the tower to not only allow for a system of aperture but also a system with very specific aesthetic qualities.

    The work of Mexican sculptor Jorge Yaspik, as seen below, works with different type of stones to deal with mass and how that mass is cut which challenges the qualities of the mass. In a sense I would argue that that it challenges the realness of the object of the stone. The cuts have a defamiliarizing effect on the stone which creates a strange tension between the natural stone and the man-made cuts into the stone. It is with this sort of sensibility that the cracks into the east façade of the tower are created. The cracks challenge tight programmatic needs of a tower in a way by increasing special interactions on the east façade that looks towards the rest of Soho. Aesthetically the cracks are oriented vertically to give a nod to the vertically of a tower. They Challenge the mass and materiality of the concrete façade. The cracks also challenge the mass of the tower by obscuring and enhancing the depth of the façade, which allows for a system of division of units and creating a sort of in-between space for the units. Towards the bottom of the building, the cracks reappear as something else. They organize themselves to a semi-normative condition and space to allow for the multi-use office programmatic needs, and at the same time create nooks to work in. The cracks also expand to create the lobby condition on the ground floor, where the building opens up to the park across the street. The cracks also allow for an insertion of balcony entities that are a foreign protrusion from the cracks. The Balcony entities in turn, challenge the cracks themselves by existing as ephemeral boundless objects with no hard edges. It is this strange tension that creates a dramatic spacial shift from the unit to the balconies. The secondary aperture system is the applied texture to the east façade, where it not only acts as an aperture system for the housing units but also aesthetically acts as a surface quality that challenges the solidity of a concrete, almost brutalist façade. They also have the added effect of obscuring the mass of the building by adding a hyper texture that obscures the reading of the mass of the building.

    sP: What or who influenced this project?
    DBH: Object Oriented Ontology (cf. Graham Harman) and Speculative Realism.

    sP: What were you reading/listening to/watching while developing this project?
    DBH: Reading: Graham Harman, The Quadruple Object; Michael Young, “The Estranged Object”; Aesthetic Theory, ed. Mark Foster Gage; Log 33; and Reiser + Umemoto, Atlas of Novel Tectonics. Listening to: San Fermin; Kendrick Lamar; DJ Snake; MO; Josef Salvat; Rudimental; and various podcasts. Watching Narcos.

    sP: Whose work is currently on your radar?
    DBH: Jason Payne, Young + Ayata, Paul Priesner, and Andrew Zago.

    Additional credits and links:
    [harropdesign.com]

    , , , , ,

  • WP_Modern_Notepad

    Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.