advisor: M. Casey REHM.
suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
Chris THACKREY & Simeon BRUGGER: The durational nature of this work necessitates a spatio-hyletic mediation of instantiated matter that does not fixate on the quantification of substantial objects, but instead considers objects as entities in perpetual motion within the spatial outlining of the void. . . .
“Our existence and the ontology of the objects around us are in a state of perpetual mediation.” — Levi Bryant, Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media.
The durational nature of this work necessitates a spatio-hyletic mediation of instantiated matter that does not fixate on the quantification of substantial objects, but instead considers objects as entities in perpetual motion within the spatial outlining of the void. When we engage such an environment we encounter anamorphic objects that shift over time and never assume a definitive figure. Simulated objects are always capable of actualizing more matter than is currently present or embodied within corporeal space, since they are part of to a cartographic domain under constant expansion as infinite hylomorphic possibilities thwart any concrete definition of space. This inconclusiveness reflects a technical jouissance, or a satisfactory drive that produces infinite surplus of non-standard deviations, to cite Lacan’s term for the apparatus of jouissance. The aim of the machine is not towards any finite goal; in missing the mark we achieve the perpetual satisfaction of overshooting into a quantitative surplus. In other words, less is less, a perpetual surplus is infinitely more, and Mies is rolling in his grave.
Such spatio-temporal matter would account for the astronomical amounts of data seen both in the conception of this project as a bit-stream operation that brought about the output, and in a tendency towards big data growing in digital design. More recently than Lacan, Timothy Morton’s concept of hyperobjects offers yet another source implying the object in motion. In the case of our studio work, the surplus possibilities of instantiated matter ultimately required curation or a cartographic mapping scheme in order to provide a glimpse into what possibilities could incarnate through such a process. This reflects the incomprehensibility of the hyperobject, amorphic and far too immense to been seen wholly at any given time. The hyperobject suggests our speculations may fall short in the wake of matter that has agency beyond decisions of human comprehension.
sP: What or who influenced this project?
CT: Freud’s figure of the Prothesengott, or “Prosthetic God” exposed a fundamental dichotomy between technological objects and real objects, in that language is prosthetic by nature.
sP: What were you reading/listening to/watching while developing this project?
CT: Reading: Mark Z. Danielewski, House of Leaves; Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects; The Accelerationist Reader; and Levi Bryant’s blog Larval Subjects. Listening to Amon Tobin.
sP: Whose work is currently on your radar?
CT: Hugh Ferriss; Scott Robertson; Eva Franz and Andy Goralczyk; Niccoló Casas; and Alexander McQueen.
Additional credits and links:
Advisor: Casey Rehm.
SCI-Arc 2GAX Advisors: Casey Rehm, Marcelyn Gow, Florencia Pita, Herwig Baumgartner.